赛车pk10官网开奖结果

Home page
group profile
Qualification honor
Engineering case
group News
Group activities
Human Resources
Message management
contact us
More
京华医院
Home
>
group News
>
Industry news
>
Luban Award for Building Issues Frequently Exists in Luban Spirit

Luban Award for Building Issues Frequently Exists in Luban Spirit

Author:
source:
2017/09/01 17:20

"Luban spirit" diligently inherits the rules and ingeniously innovates tools. Practical and exquisite architecture, efficient and honest service. "Established in 1987 with the support of the Ministry of Construction, it is the original China Construction Industry Association to implement the" hundred-year plan, quality first "policy. In the industry, the Luban Award is Oscar, It is the highest honor for the quality of the construction industry. Bird's Nest, Water Cube, Yellow Crane Tower, etc. are all award-winning projects. In recent years, problems exposed by the quality of the project have emerged endlessly, and those projects that have won the Luban Award have been exposed. The quality problem is even more chilling, which also makes people question the selection of the Luban Award. Some people say that these award-winning projects with major hidden safety hazards should be awarded the "Luban Award". Although this is very sharp, it is a heartfelt word. The following are some of the Luban Award projects listed by the author: 1 "Luban Award" winners frequently have security incidents, and the mention of "Hebei Yineng Smoke Tower Engineering Co., Ltd." is definitely the first one to be associated with "11.24 Fengcheng Power Plant construction platform collapse accident", Hebei Guohua Dingzhou Power Plant ’s 8,500 square meters cooling tower, river Nanqinbei Power Plant's 8,500 square meter cooling tower project has won the "Luban Award". A company that has won the "Luban Award" twice has been involved in safety accidents many times, and this Jiangxi safety accident is even more shocking! This previous one Who hit the face after the incident 2 The Chinese Sports Museum claims to stand for a century, but the building cracked throughout the year ... The problem has not been completely solved, and the foundation of the Chinese Sports Museum has unevenly sunk, more than 85% of The floor and the wall have been penetrated and cracked, and the load-bearing steel beams have broken. There is a major safety hazard. The most ironic thing is that this project was the 1991 National Excellent Luban Award. 3 The "Bishop's Tower" of Wuhan University is Wuhan University and even the entire East Lake The tallest buildings along the line. After the building is put into use, it violates the planning of the East Lake Scenic Area because of its high height, which obstructs the view of the landscape and destroys the contours of the East Lake landscape and natural mountains. At the same time, the existing buildings in the area have a poor appearance and environmental quality. The planning requirements of Dao and Donghu Scenic Areas are inconsistent with the requirements of campus construction. 100 million yuan was invested in the construction and it took only 16 years to spend 1,000 yuan. Ten thousand demolition—what is this concept? Since it violated the scenic area plan, why did n’t it take into account these, why was it built, and it was built so high? Who would believe that this building has won the highest honor of China's construction project-"Luban Award"? The life span is only 16 years, and the longevity of the pig house next door is not long. This is not a joke! 4 The new building of the School of Life Sciences of Peking University has also won the "Luban Award", the highest award in China's construction industry. It can be difficult It is believed that this building cost as much as 140 million yuan, and a large area of water leakage occurred just one year after it was put into use. Many walls were soaked, and water was accumulated in several laboratories. The "Luban Award" was awarded to the "problem building." "This is a wonderful irony of the" Lu Ban Award "! 5 The safety situation of the Tongling Yangtze River Highway Bridge in Anhui, known as the" First Bridge of the Anhui River, "has aroused discussion and concerns from netizens and industry insiders. The construction of this bridge The unit is Hunan Road and Bridge Group Co., Ltd., which has recently been questioned as a "bridge collapse company." So, the problem is naturally: how has the Tongling Yangtze River Highway Bridge, which has been criticized for its engineering quality since the opening of the traffic, won these awards, especially the Luban Award, which is the highest honor in China's construction engineering industry. This is undoubtedly the originator of Chinese architecture. Luban's great shame! 6 Beijing West Railway Station, a building that won the "Luban Award", the highest national building quality award, became famous for its "Tofu Residue" project less than two years after its completion. The "tofu dregs" at the West Railway Station can't be said to endanger the lives of passengers, but the high-speed rail at a speed of nearly 400 kilometers per hour and the subway operating at a depth of dozens of meters underground, once the accident occurs, the consequences can be imagined. 7 The roof of Area D of Capital Airport Terminal T3 was partially blown away by strong winds. The airport claimed that the accident did not affect the safe operation of the airport. The quality of the Luban Award-winning airport terminal can't stand the test. It is understood that before this, the metal plate of the T3 terminal building was lifted by the wind once, and the relevant person in charge of the Capital Airport Expansion Command had previously stated that the T3 can withstand 12 gales. It is a joke to be able to withstand a 12-level gale but not the sandstorm in Beijing! The first article about the Luban Award selection method on the website of the Ministry of Construction is to implement the "hundred-year plan, quality first" policy. Judging from the above cases, the quality of the Luban project is just that, it is a disgrace to the "Luban Award"! We all know that the contemporary manufacturing industry is led by Germany. When it comes to made in China, the people themselves have no confidence. This is even more true in the construction field. The quality of the loud Luban Award project frequently appears to have quality problems. It is so embarrassing that the amount of gold is greatly reduced. On February 9, 2017, the official website of the China Construction Association issued a notice to the revised version of the "Luban Award Selection Method." Published. According to the author, these changes are still irrelevant to the quality problems exposed by Luban Project. There are 7 amendments to the Luban Award selection method: 1. The number of selections has been increased from "200" to "240". 2. The quality of the project was changed from "use after one year" to "more than one year". 3. Added Article 15: "For very large construction projects with an investment of more than 2 billion yuan, the construction unit can lead the organization, and the construction contractor units can jointly declare." 4. Added the qualification for "Other Structure Projects with Investment over 200 Million Yuan". 5. Added the qualification for "reconstruction of ancient buildings in groups above 20,000 square meters". 6, no longer require DVD recording, change to image data. 7. Modified the scale of the natural gas pipeline project. In the case of a substantial increase in the current volume of the building, the increase in the number of Luban Awards is understandable. However, questions about how to deal with the quality of the Luban Award-winning project that are of great concern to everyone, and whether to establish a return visit mechanism and cancellation mechanism for the Luban Award, are still not reflected in the relevant provisions. As early as the end of 2012, Netease News excerpted an article from the Xi'an Daily, which has caused thinking about how to deal with quality problems in the Luban Award-winning project. Quality is the "life gate" of the nation's construction. We must be responsible to the people and to history. What the rulers of the Luban Award lack is the determination and courage to say no to the profligate, and as judges, we should be fair, The principles of fairness and openness should be based on scientific and reasonable selection methods, strict implementation of the evaluation system, practical observance of the evaluation discipline, rejection of all fake and inferior products, and no stain on the wall of the highest quality honor. No one can trample on, this is the heritage and culture of an ancient country with 5,000 years of civilization and history! However, behind these world-renowned projects, this series of quality issues are still emerging endlessly, and it is our own kind of "dignity of the country" Blasphemy, we have to move forward, to develop, to take off, and to build an economically powerful country, but now our "Where is the spirit of Luban?"

Previous:
Next: